Alien Confidential Multimedia

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ Alien Confidential Multimedia / Alien Confidential Multimedia (Disk 1 of 9).adf / MISC / 200 < prev

Wrap

Text File | 1992-09-02 | 46.8 KB | 1,006 lines

Summary: The annual report on UFOs in Canada for 1992 Keywords: Canada,UFO,report,UFOROM,1992 Sender: news@ccu.umanitoba.ca Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1993 14:58:36 GMT * ^^^^^^^^^^^ / .................. \ =========================== + + The 1992 CANADIAN UFO SURVEY Compiled by Chris A. Rutkowski Contributors: ____________ Paul Anderson Roy Bauer Grant Cameron Daniel Clairmont Graham Conway Lorne Goldfader Robert Hawkes Gordon Kijek Victor Lourenco Christian Page Michael Strainic Tom Theophanous Ruth Walde Bonnie Wheeler Published by Ufology Research of Manitoba Box 1918 Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3C 3R2 Converted into ASCII for disseminating in the Internet by David Thacker The 1992 Canadian UFO Survey Since 1989, UFO case data has been solicited from all known and active investigators and researchers in Canada for analyses and comparison with other compilations. Before that time, individual researchers would normally maintain their own files, with little or no communication with others. Even representatives of major UFO organizations often do not regularly submit case data, and the parent organizations themselves tend not to do much analyses with the data they do receive. After favourable responses from the publication of previous Canadian UFO Surveys, UFOROM decided to continue the systematic collection of raw UFO report data in Canada and prepare yearly reports for general circulation. It has been always felt that the dissemination of such data would be of great advantage to researchers, so it is presented here once again as data with some analysis. The response from Canadian researchers to requests for 1992 data was better than in previous years. More cases were submitted from more investigators, including those in Ontario, resulting in a marked increase in the number of cases used in the analyses. While this prevents direct comparisons with previous years, this has the advantage of being more comprehensive. There are still those researchers, however, who, for whatever reasons, do not submit cases for the annual survey. In addition, some researchers do not maintain useable case files and do not retain quantitative criteria in their investigations (for example, contactee groups). It is now suspected that only a small fraction of 'active' ufologists and self-proclaimed 'researchers' actually investigate cases and maintain useable records. In 1989, 141 UFO reports were obtained for analysis. In 1990, 194 reports were recorded. In 1991, 165 reports were received. In 1992, 223 cases were examined. These reports came from contributing investigators' files, press clippings and the files of the National Research Council of Canada. The NRC routinely receives UFO reports from private citizens and from RCMP, civic police and military personnel. The number of cases in 1992 represents a 35% increase over the previous year, which had been a 15% decrease from that of 1990. Assuming an average of 180 cases per year, the variation is uniform in either direction, and we can suggest that the number of UFO reports per year in Canada is relatively constant, even allowing for the influx of cases from new contributors. In 1992, there were apparent significant increases in the number of reports in Manitoba, while there was an apparent decrease in reports in Alberta and Quebec. As usual, British Columbia represents the largest fraction of UFO reports of all the provinces. Since 1990, BC has garnered between 35% and 40% of the total number of cases per year. As mentioned in previous annual reports, this is partly due to the highly efficient UFO reporting system in that province, and the comparatively large number of active investigators. The rest of the Provinces appear to have had average numbers of reports in 1991. TABLE 1 Distribution of UFO Reports by Province BC AB SK MB ON PQ NB PEI NS NF YK NWT 1989 15 16 18 22 34 28 1 - 3 3 - 1 1990 76 9 10 20 21 36 7 3 5 4 1 2 1991 59 22 7 6 30 16 9 1 7 4 1 - 1992 90 8 9 23 56 10 9 - 3 4 3 1 The monthly breakdowns of reports during each year show slightly different patterns from those of previous years. In 1989, there was a significant increase in UFO reports in the late fall, with other months maintaining what appeared to be a fairly constant 'normal' level of reports. But 1990 saw two major increases in report numbers in two months: April and August. The 'normal' level of monthly report numbers appeared to be constant in other months, with minor fluctuations. In 1991, reports peaked in August, but there was no single obvious trough, and there were an abnormally large number of reports in the winter months. The 1992 breakdown again shows no clear trend in monthly distribution. In fact, reports are fairly evenly distributed throughout the year, with no marked increase in reports in either summer or winter. This is curious, since previous analyses of UFO reports have almost always shown a peak in the summer months, as would be expected because most UFO sightings are simple NLs and there are generally more outdoor observers available during the summer months. This would be especially expected in Canada, where the seasonal temperatures vary considerably, and there is much less evening outdoor activity in the winter. Nevertheless, UFO report numbers were not significantly less in the winter than in the summer. An average of 18 UFO reports per month was calculated from the data. TABLE 2 UFO Reports per Month J F M A M J J A S O N D 1989 13 9 6 9 5 9 5 5 12 32 27 9 1990 17 7 6 47 10 10 9 47 15 16 10 - 1991 13 7 17 12 7 12 16 25 16 12 11 17 1992 15 16 27 16 22 16 23 19 11 16 21 21 Selecting only the cases labelled 'unknown,' two peaks are seen: one in March and the other in July. Other months are distributed more evenly. While it is tempting to regard these two peaks as real anomalies, given the relatively small number of cases in the sample, it is more likely that they are statistical artefacts. TABLE 2A Monthly Breakdown of Unknowns J F M A M J J A S O N D 1992 2 2 8 3 5 4 11 1 3 4 5 1 An analysis by report type shows a similar breakdown to that found in previous years. The numbers of cases of a particular type remained roughly constant except for the category of Nocturnal Lights, which exhibited nearly a twofold increase in 1990. However, numbers of NLs were closer to a 1989 level in 1991. Relative numbers of specific report types remained within a close range of previous years' values. Nocturnal lights, for example, were 60% of all reports in 1989, 73% on 1990, 67% in 1991, and 61% in 1992. In general, NLs can be said to comprise about two-thirds of all UFO reports. TABLE 3 UFO Report Types NL ND DD CE1 CE2 CE3 CE4 EV RD PH 1989 84 20 16 10 7 - 2 2 - - 1990 141 24 15 2 1 - 4 3 - - 1991 110 26 13 7 4 1 2 - 1 1 1992 135 44 20 13 5 2 3 - - 1 For those unfamiliar with the categories, a summary follows: NL (Nocturnal Light) - light source in night sky ND (Nocturnal Disc) - light source in night sky that appears to have a definite shape DD (Daylight Disc) - unknown object observed during daytime hours CE1 (Close Encounter of the First Kind) - ND or DD occurring within 200 metres of a witness CE2 (Close Encounter of the Second Kind) - CE1 where physical effects left or noted CE3 (Close Encounter of the Third Kind) - CE1 where figures/entities are encountered CE4 (Close Encounter of the Fourth Kind) - an alleged 'abduction' or 'contact' experience EV (Evidence) - a case where physical traces left by an event are the primary claim RD (Radar) - UFOs observed on radar PH (Photograph) - photograph(s) of a UFO, but no actual sighting The category of Nocturnal Disc was created by UFOROM for differentiation within its own report files. Similarly, Evidence is also an ad hoc creation, and may not be applicable by other researchers. Normally, Evidence would include such physical traces as 'crop circles', 'landing rings' and 'saucer nests'. However, in 1990 there was a great increase in the numbers of such traces discovered in North America, and it was decided to treat these as separate from UFO reports in these Surveys. [For the record, there were 27 'crop circles' and related traces discovered in Canada in 1990, 39 in 1991, and 46 in 1992. Many of these were investigated by UFO researchers, and a few were reported to the NRC. UFOROM is associated with the North American Institute for Crop Circle Research, which investigates such cases and publishes separate reports on its findings.] The breakdown by evaluative conclusions for 1992 cases can be shown to be similar to results from previous years. There were three operative categories: Insufficient Information, Possible or Probable Explanation, and Unknown. Readers are warned that a classification of Unknown does not imply that an alien spacecraft was observed; no such interpretation can be made with certainty, based on the given data (though the probability of this scenario is admittedly never zero). In most cases, the evaluations are made subjectively by both the contributing investigators and the compiler of this report. The category of Unknown is adopted only if the contributed data or case report contains enough information that a conventional explanation cannot be satisfactorily proposed. This does not mean that the case will never be explained, but only that a viable explanation is not immediately obvious. In 1992, a change was adopted in order to include Explained cases in the statistics. While all categories of UFO reports were solicited from investigators, few included Explained cases in their submissions because they were not, by definition, unidentified flying objects. However, this raises several concerns. First, it is known that many UFOs become IFOs only after moderate investigative efforts. There is no question that many cases in the Possible or Probable category are in fact IFOs. Second, previous studies of UFO reports, including Blue Book and the Colorado project, tabulated IFOs as Explained cases and indicated these conclusions in their reports. Third, whether consciously or subconsciously, researchers may discard IFO cases as unnecessary and not submit them for the total analyses. This will, naturally, skew the statistics in favour of UFOs. As an illustration, one contributor to the annual survey noted that 'dozens' of other UFO reports were received but not tabulated because they were immediately discernable as IFOs. In 1991, two UFO reports were Explained, but not included in the statistical calculations. In 1992, 17 were Explained, and were used in the annual breakdown of data. The hourly distribution of cases tended to follow the same pattern for 1992 as in previous years. There appears to be a peak near 2200 hours local and a trough around 1000 hours local. In 1992, a secondary peak near 2300 hours local was also evident. TABLE 4 UFO Reports by Conclusion 1989 1990 1991 1992 # % # % # % # % Insufficient Info. 74 52.5 90 46.4 80 49.1 83 37 Poss./Prob. Expl. 47 33.3 78 40.2 69 42.3 74 33 Unknown 20 14.2 26 13.4 14 8.6 49 22 Explained - - - - (2) - 17 8 The average number of witnesses per case went down from a value of 2.12/case in 1989 to 1.4/case in 1990, then up again to 1.91/case in 1991. In 1992, the average number of witnesses was up again, at 2.36/case. It is not known what this may indicate. It is possible that there might have been a tendency for only one of a pair or group of witnesses to report an incident in some situations, and, hence, this value would wax or wane depending on the social factor. This may have been true in the NRC files, which may not reflect the total number of witnesses sharing a UFO experience. However, these figures still show that a typical UFO experience has more than one witness, supporting the contention that UFO sightings represent observations of physical phenomena. In fact, other studies, including the 1992 analyses, suggest that the typical UFO experience is shared by at least two witnesses. The category of Duration is interesting in that it represents the subjective length of time the UFO experience lasted. Naturally, these times are greatly suspect because it is known that people tend to misjudge the flow of time. However, some people can be good at estimating time, so this value has some meaning. Although an estimate of 'one hour' may be in error by several minutes, it is unlikely that the correct value would be, for example, one minute (disregarding the claims of 'missing time' during the abduction category of experiences). Furthermore, there have been cases when a UFO was observed and clocked accurately, so that we can be reasonably certain that UFO events can last considerable periods of time. The average duration of a sighting can be calculated as a summation of all given durations then divided by the number of cases with a stated duration. The resulting value for 1991 was about 12 minutes, down from 19 minutes in 1990. In 1992, the value is again around 12 minutes. This surprisingly long duration is likely due to the large number of sightings lasting only a few seconds combined with a few that lasted several hours. In cases where a colour of an object was reported in 1992, the most common colour was white (55 cases), followed distantly by red (24 cases). Other colours were also represented, although there is a noticeable change from previous years, when green was a dominant colour. Since most UFOs are nocturnal starlike objects, the abundance of white objects is not surprising. The green coloured objects were, in general, bolides, which were seen in significant numbers in 1991 and 1992. Summary of Results ------------------ As with previous annual Surveys, the 1992 Survey does not offer any positive proof of the physical reality of UFOs. However, it does show that some phenomenon which is called a UFO is continually being observed by witnesses. The typical UFO sighting is that of two people observing a moving, distant white or red light for a period of over 15 minutes. In most cases, the UFO is likely to be eventually identified as a conventional object such as an astronomical object. However, in a small percentage of cases, some UFOs do not appear to have an easy explanation and they may be given the label of 'unknown'. What are these 'unknowns'? An additional classification is useful to try and better understand this kind of report. In the gathering of data for the study, a value was assigned for a personal evaluation of the Reliability of the report. This value gives the likelihood that a UFO experience 'really' occurred as described by the witness. Granted, it is impossible for any investigator to judge this absolute value; often, a subjective value for two categories of 'strangeness' and 'reliability' is assigned. The Reliability value is a subjective value imposed by the investigator or compiler (or both) with a scale such that the low values represent cases with little information content and observers of limited observing abilities and the higher values represent those cases with excellent witnesses (pilots, police, etc.) and also are well-investigated. Naturally, cases with higher values are preferred. The Strangeness value is another subjective evaluation of the case, and assigned a value of 0 to 9, based on the peculiarity of the experience. NLs with little variance from the appearance of a star or aircraft are given low Strangeness values, while cases involving entities or structured craft observed at close range (and therefore unlikely to be conventional objects) are given high Strangeness values. The average Reliability of reports was 6.21, and the average Strangeness was 5.64. In other words, most UFO reports are only slightly unusual (perhaps a light maneuvering in an odd manner unlike an aircraft's normal flight pattern), and are either minimally-investigated, reported by average observers, or both. More revealing is the ratio of Strangeness/Reliability. This is a measure of the unusual nature of a case versus its information content. A ratio of unity suggests that an 'uninteresting' case, probably explained easily as a conventional object, has a low information content. Alternatively, unity can suggest a case with high Strangeness, perhaps a Close Encounter, has high information content and is well-investigated. A ratio near zero implies a conventional object that is well-observed and is well-investigated. A ratio greater than unity implies a report has high strangeness but low information content. A possible such case would be a close encounter case that is not well-investigated, and may be more anecdotal than 'real'. Explained reports had an average S/R ratio of 0.586. Cases with Possible or Probable explanations had an average ratio of 0.690. Cases with Insufficient Information had ratios greater than unity, at 1.062, and Unknown cases had an average ratio of 1.092. From these values, we can suggest that as the Strangeness of reports increase, so does their likelihood of being poorly investigated and of having less credible witnesses. Cases were coded and entered into an ACCESS database on a common PC clone environment. The coding key is as follows: Example: 9920115 1636 BC Fort Nelson DD 6 7 1.30 2 Red Disc P Sound heard Field: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Field 1 is the date, in YYYMMDD format (UFOROM is now coding to allow for the next millennium). Field 2 is the time, according to the 24-hour clock, local time. Field 3 is the Province. Field 4 is the Geographical Location, or common map name. Field 5 is the Modified Hynek Classification. Field 6 is the Strangeness, as described in the text. Field 7 is the Reliability, as described in the text. Field 8 is the duration of the sighting, in minutes and seconds (i.e. 2 minutes, 15 seconds is 002.15) Field 9 is the number of witnesses. Field 10 is the colour of the primary object. Field 11 is the shape of the primary object. Field 12 is the Conclusion given to the case: I = Insufficient information for an assessment; P = Possible or probable explanation, given the facts; E = Explained; or U = Unknown or unexplained at the present time. Field 13 contains any short comments that distinguish individual cases. A further breakdown of Unknowns can be done to select only those cases with high Reliability (i.e. Reliability 8). In the 1991 study, only 12 cases (7.3%) were high-reliability unknowns. In 1992, this number was 17 cases (7.62%). This agrees reasonably well with the 1989 results (4.9%) and with the 1990 results (4.6%), but is slightly higher for reasons that could include sampling techniques and inconsistent subjective evaluations. The 1992 high-reliability cases were the following: ND Case 9920122 1940 NB Woodstock NL Case 9920202 2000 NB Hartland ND Case 9920304 2130 ON Toronto ND Case 9920419 0130 NF Gander PH Case 9920502 1200 BC Kelowna C1 Case 9920503 2010 BC Squamish NL Case 9920513 2204 BC Langley ND Case 9920624 0015 BC Vancouver DD Case 9920703 0840 BC Kyuquot ND Case 9920717 2200 AB Fairview NL Case 9920720 1215 ON Toronto * ND Case 9920720 2358 MB Winnipeg ND Case 9920721 2330 MB Winnipeg C1 Case 9920915 2300 BC Summerland ND Case 9921007 1930 SK Moosomin C4 Case 9921101 0200 MB Winnipeg C1 Case 9921127 2000 SK Saskatoon The interpretation of this list is that these cases were among the most challenging of all the reports received in 1992. It should be noted that many UFO cases go unreported, and that there may be ten times as many UFO sightings that go unreported as those which get reported to public, private or military agencies. Furthermore, it should be noted that some cases with lower reliability ratings suffer only from incomplete investigations, and that they may well be more mysterious than those on the above list. NL Case 9920720 has erroneous data, as 1215 is hardly a nocturnal time. The single C4 case needs some explanation as well. In general, Close Encounters of the Fourth Kind are 'abductions,' and are difficult to use as data in analyses. Often, C4s occur throughout an experiencer's life. Furthermore, an exact time of an abduction is rarely given or deduced by investigators. In fact, some C4s are only uncovered through the (controversial) use of hypnosis, and the time of occurrence is vague or in dispute. Because abduction experiences are difficult to pigeonhole into various rigid categories and time constraints, it is usually inadvisable to include such cases in UFO report analyses. The C4 case included in the above list did seem to provide enough data for inclusion. The date and time were accurately known, and represented a single event, not an ongoing series of experiences. In addition, the witness voluntarily provided details of the experience and submitted to an investigation. In future analyses of UFO data, it is unlikely that similar C4s will be included. The experiences do not lend themselves to statistical comparisons with other UFO reports, and can be interpreted in many ways. The C4s included in the 1992 Canadian UFO Survey provided insight into the problems involved in their objective evaluation. We have learned that UFOs are constantly being reported at a rate of about ten per month across all of Canada, and one or two per month in most provinces. Witnesses range from farmhands to airline pilots and from teachers to police. Witnesses represent all age groups and racial origin. What is being observed? In most cases, only ordinary objects. However, this begs a question. If people are reporting things that can be explained, then the objects they observed were 'really' there. Were the objects we can't identify 'really' there as well? If so, what were they? These are questions only continued, rational research can answer, and only if researchers have the support and encouragement of both scientists and the public. Chris A. Rutkowski Ufology Research of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba 29 March 1992 Further Comments It is most instructive to compare the UFOROM analyses with those of the National Sighting Research Center of New Jersey, headed by Paul Ferrughelli. The NSRC results have been reported in a series of publications, a recent one being the National Sighting Yearbook 1991. The NSRC collected UFO reports from newspaper clippings and UFO publications, and analyzed the raw UFO data. Because of the difference in data sources, a comparison with the UFOROM results will not be true. However, it is still interesting to compare the two studies. The NSRC tabulated a total of 195 American UFO reports in 1990, and 197 in 1992. These numbers are comparable with those of Canada for the same years. However, because of the larger population, it is likely that the USA had many, many more sightings that were never obtained through the NSRC's sampling technique. The NSRC study revealed essentially a reversed monthly distribution for UFO reports compared with Canada. Whereas US sightings peaked in the winter and had a noticeable trough in the summer, the Canadian peaks are traditionally in the summer. However, the 1991 Canadian distribution was much more even, with peaks in both winter and summer. Grouping the two studies together yields a monthly distribution with troughs in mid-summer and mid-winter, with slight variations month-to-month. It is possible to speculate that with adequate report sampling, there would be no monthly variation in the number of sightings, except for major flaps which would be more noticeable in an international survey. The 1992 monthly distribution is much more uniform, The 1992 American data had monthly distribution peaks in March, September and October. No such peaks were evident in the Canadian data. Like the Canadian study, the American data was unevenly distributed throughout the country. Most American reports in the 1991 study generally came from just two states, Florida and Indiana. The Florida flap is likely due to the Gulf Breeze reports which receive a great deal of media attention. The distribution of sighting duration was nearly identical to the Canadian study. The average duration of a typical UFO sighting is about 15 minutes. For the hourly distribution of UFO cases, the American study found a symmetrical distribution with a pronounced peak at 9 PM local time and a trough at around 9 AM local time. Canadian distributions are normally about one hour later in each peak, but are otherwise identical in distribution. Breakdown by Hynek classification yields identical distributions within both American and Canadian studies, with NLs being overwhelmingly predominant. In summary, Ferrughelli's analyses of American UFO data yield results remarkably similar to the UFOROM Canadian studies, despite the differences in collection procedures. The most marked discrepancy between the two studies was in the monthly distribution of UFO reports. This was probably an artefact of the NSRC sampling technique, which does not involve solicitation of UFO reports from investigators but significantly relies upon newspaper accounts for many of its cases. The two studies are complementary, and will aid further research into the UFO phenomenon. [Reference: Ferrughelli, P. National Sighting Yearbook 1991. National Sighting Research Center, 60 Allen Drive, Wayne, NJ 07470.] Here is the 1992 Canadian UFO Survey sighting database in text format. ====================================================================== 1,9920105,2300,BC,SQUAMISH,NL,1,2,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,SUSPECTED METEORITE 2,9920107,245,BC,SARDIS,NL,5,4,7.5,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,I,JUMPING STAR 3,9920212,603,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,1,4,20,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,CONVENTIONAL AIRCRAFT? 4,9920215,1425,BC,SURREY,DD,5,4,1,1,,IRREGULAR,I,ODD-SHAPED CLOUD AND LIGHT 5,9920216,2100,BC,LADYSMITH,NL,2,2,10,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,STAR 6,9920220,2305,BC,QUESNEL,NL,7,6,55,3,,RECTANGLE,I,PLATE WITH COLUMNS? 7,9920223,300,BC,RICHMOND,NL,5,4,5,1,,IRREGULAR,I,CHANGED SHAPE SEVERAL TIMES 8,9920307,1200,BC,SURREY,DD,7,5,20,1,SILVER,DISC,U,OBJECT APPEARED METALLIC AND STRUCTURED 9,9920309,2000,BC,SURREY,ND,3,5,10,1,VARIABLE,OVAL,I,CHANGED COLOURS 10,9920309,200,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,ND,2,5,60,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,RED AND BLUE FLASHING LIGHTS 11,9920311,2205,BC,PENTICTON,NL,1,4,.01,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,METEORITE 12,9920317,2111,BC,PRINCE GEORGE,NL,7,7,.3,2,GREEN,IRREGULAR,U, LONG, GREEN, FLUORESCENT TUBE 13,9920317,1330,BC,KITTIMAT,NL,7,5,15,1,,CRESCENT,U,1/4 MOON-SHAPED OBJECT, MOVING 14,9920318,305,BC,HORSESHOE BAY,NL,2,5,.03,1,WHITE,IRREGULAR,P,SLOW, BRIGHT STREAK 15,9920320,1315,BC,VANCOUVER,DD,7,6,1,2,,SQUARE,I, 16,9920321,1000,BC,HEFFLEY CREEK,NL,3,4,30,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,STROBE, FLASHES 17,9920326,25,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,3,5,5,3,,POINT SOURCE,I,SATELLITE 18,9920327,2310,BC,RICHMOND,NL,1,5,60,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,PLANET 19,9920401,1600,BC,MISSION,C1,8,7,45,2,,,I,OBJECT SEEN IN THE SKY 20,9920401,300,BC,WHITE ROCK,NL,5,4,.1,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,ROTATING, THEN SPLIT IN TWO 21,9920402,215,BC,LILLOOET,NL,4,3,1,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,LIGHTS JUMPING UP AND DOWN 22,9920404,115,BC,NEW WESTMINISTER,NL,6,6,.15,1,,TRIANGLE,P, 23,9920510,2100,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,1,2,.1,1,,,I, 24,9920520,2330,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,5,3,2,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,7 LIGHTS, ALTERNATING FLASHES 25,9920524,0,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,6,6,10,1,,TRIANGLE,U,V SHAPED OBJECT, NO SOUND 26,9920528,1500,BC,SURREY,DD,4,3,5,2,,,I,OBJECT WAS MOVING OVER POWER LINES 27,9920603,1845,BC,WHISTLER,NL,7,7,.25,1,,IRREGULAR,U,TOP-SHAPED OBJECT, HOVERED 28,9920604,2015,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,7,5,2,2,,IRREGULAR,U,SILENT PLATFORM IN SKY 29,9920606,2000,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,1,2,.01,1,,,I, 30,9920612,1924,BC,PITT MEADOWS,NL,7,2,12,1,,,I,OPAQUE OBJECT; ALTERNATIVELY MOVING AND STOPPING 31,9920703,840,BC,KYUQUOT,DD,8,8,90,1,,OVOID,U,SOLID-APPEARING EGG; SEEN FROM TUGBOAT 32,9920708,2340,BC,SURREY,NL,1,2,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,METEORITE 33,9920710,27,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,6,6,15,25,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,E,LASER SHINING ON CLOUDS 34,9920711,2135,BC,CHILLIWACK,NL,4,4,120,1,,,I,UNDEFINED OBJECT, MOVING 35,9920716,1910,BC,SURREY,NL,1,2,.1,1,WHITE,,E,CAR LIGHTS 36,9920719,305,BC,WEST VANCOUVER,C3,9,6,1,2,,,U,ENCOUNTER WITH ENTITIES 37,9920817,100,BC,SURREY,NL,4,4,15,4,,,U, 38,9920818,1918,BC,COQUITLAM,NL,4,2,.1,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,E,DISTANT HELICOPTER 39,9920831,320,BC,DUNCAN,NL,8,6,60,2,,IRREGULAR,I,CYLINDER WITH ARMS 40,9920901,1530,BC,VANCOUVER,DD,6,3,30,2,,ROUND,I,MOVING FAST 41,9920906,1650,BC,WEST VANCOUVER,NL,2,2,25,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,E,STAR 42,9921011,0,BC,NELSON,NL,5,5,.03,3,,SPHERE,I,BOUNCING BALL IN SKY 43,9921013,2100,BC,SECHELT,ND,7,6,40,1,,DISC,U,ROCKING BACK AND FORTH 44,9921015,2245,BC,VANCOUVER,ND,5,3,.05,1,,ROUND,I,ROUND OBJECT WITH LIGHTS 45,9921021,23,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,6,3,10,2,,,I,FLUORESCENT LIGHT 46,9921021,250,BC,BURNABY,NL,6,5,2,1,,,I,3 SMALL OBJECTS, ONE LARGE 47,9921029,1930,BC,VERNON,NL,2,2,.1,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,STAR 48,9921116,30,BC,DELTA,ND,7,3,4,1,,TRIANGLE,U,DELTA WING; NOISE HEARD 49,9921119,535,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,1,2,.15,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,BUOY OR BOAT LIGHT 50,9921205,2000,BC,WILLIAMS LAKE,ND,7,6,8,1,,ROUND,U,BLINKING OBJECT 51,9921213,2310,BC,WHITE ROCK,NL,2,3,60,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,OBJECT BOBBING IN THE AIR 52,9921214,2300,BC,WHITE ROCK,NL,2,3,90,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,OBJECT BOBBING IN THE AIR 53,9921225,430,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,8,3,30,1,,IRREGULAR,I,PENCIL SHAPE, THEN FANNED OUT 54,9920829,120,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,C2,9,7,30,2,,,I,DOG'S FUR CAME OUT AFTER ENCOUNTER 55,9921123,2320,BC,BURNABY,NL,5,4,5,1,,CIGAR,I,TORPEDO-SHAPED OBJECT 56,9921207,1915,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,6,2,60,1,WHITE,,E,SEARCHLIGHT 57,9920112,1900,ON,LAMBTON,C4,9,6,30,1,WHITE,,I,'ABDUCTION'? 58,9920120,2000,NB,WOODSTOCK,NL,8,8,10,10,,POINT SOURCE,I,VIDEO TAKEN BY SOME WITNESSES 59,9920120,200,ON,BRACEBRIDGE,C4,9,6,30,2,,,I,'ABDUCTION'; ENTITIES SEEN 60,9920124,2215,BC,ALEXIS CREEK,ND,8,8,1,3,YELLOW,TRIANGLE,I,DELTA, SLOW MOVING 61,9920126,1945,ON,LAMBTON,C1,7,8,60,4,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,P,PHOTOS TAKEN; STAR? 62,9920200,2000,ON,MISSISSAUGA,ND,8,5,1,3,,DISC,I,SUCER WITH LIGHTS 63,9920202,2000,NB,HARTLAND,NL,9,9,2.5,2,,TRIANGLE,U,VIDEO OF TRIANGLES; 'BOW TIE' 64,9920218,630,BC,KAMLOOPS,C1,6,8,.15,1,RED,,P,CAME WITHIN 100FT; DISAPPEARED 65,9920218,630,BC,KAMLOOPS,ND,6,8,.2,1,BLUE,ROUND,P,SHINY BALL WITH TAIL 66,9920218,630,BC,KAMLOOPS,ND,6,8,.1,2,BLUE,ROUND,P,SILVER/BLUE OBJ. WITH TAIL 67,9920218,1830,BC,COQUITLAM,NL,6,8,.2,2,WHITE,,E,'BLOWTORCH LIGHT' 68,9920218,1825,BC,RICHMOND,NL,6,8,.1,1,BLUE,,P,BOLIDE? 69,9920218,1830,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,6,8,.15,2,GREEN,,E,BOLIDE 70,9920218,630,BC,KAMLOOPS,NL,4,9,.1,20,BLUE,,E,BOLIDE 71,9920311,230,YK,WHITEHORSE,NL,7,8,2,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,GROUP OF ROTATING LIGHTS 72,9920312,1830,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,5,9,.15,2,WHITE,,P,'LIGHT STREAK' 73,9920326,1730,BC,SURREY,NL,9,7,5,1,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,U,BRIGHT LIGHT ENTERED CLOUD; DISSIPATED 74,9920415,600,YK,WHITEHORSE,C1,9,7,2.3,10,SILVER,BALL,U,GLOBE;BLINKING LIGHT;FLEW THRU VALLEY 75,9920419,130,NF,GANDER,ND,8,9,8,3,RED,RECTANGLE,U,VIDEO OF WHITE OBJ W/RED UNDERCARRIAGE 76,9920501,1945,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,ND,6,6,1,4,RED,,I, 77,9920502,1200,BC,KELOWNA,PH,8,8,5,3,,,U,HORSES REACTING;PHOTO OF SAUCER IMAGE 78,9920503,2010,BC,SQUAMISH,C1,9,8,4,3,ORANGE,DISC,U,SLOW- MOVING;DISCONTINUOUS TRAJECTORY 79,9920503,2130,BC,VANCOUVER,ND,7,8,.15,2,GREY,CIGAR,P,OBJ W/DULL GLOW;VERY FAST;1000FT? 80,9920504,2350,BC,WHITE ROCK,C1,8,7,2,2,SILVER,DISC,U,SILVER/ORANGE DISC MOVING AT TREETOP LEVEL 81,9920506,2015,BC,WEST VANCOUVER,NL,6,8,.3,1,RED,OVAL,I,HOVERED; MOVED AWAY 82,9920513,2204,BC,LANGLEY,NL,7,9,3,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,U,3 LIGHTS MOVING TOGETHER 83,9920517,2130,BC,NEW WESTMINSTER,C1,8,5,10,3,SILVER,DISC,I,DISC WITH BLUE 'LASER BEAMS' 84,9920600,2000,YK,WHITEHORSE,ND,7,7,5,10,BLACK,TRIANGLE,U,TRIANGLE WITH LIGHTS: AURORA AIRCRAFT? 85,9920602,1240,ON,PORT PERRY,NL,7,9,.25,6,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,P,MAGNESIUM FLARES 86,9920624,15,BC,VANCOUVER,ND,8,8,1.3,1,ORANGE,TRIANGLE,U,ORANGE GLOW W/WHITE HAZE; LIGHTS ON EDGE 87,9920710,2300,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,NL,8,9,.3,3,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,'METEOR' DESCENDED THEN ROSE AGAIN 88,9920720,1215,ON,TORONTO,NL,8,8,4,3,RED,,U,'LASER' SHINING ON GROUND; ANIMALS SCARED 89,9920810,2000,AB,GUY,ND,8,4,1.3,3,GREY,DISC,I,PALE DISC, FLASH OF LIGHT 90,9920813,1250,ON,HAMILTON,NL,7,8,2,5,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,I,VIDEO TAKEN NEAR BINBROOK 91,9920824,2000,SK,SASKATOON,NL,8,9,20,20,YELLOW,,E,MILITARY EXERCISE 92,9920915,2300,BC,SUMMERLAND,C1,9,8,20,3,GREY,DISC,U,'BIGGER THAN HOUSE'; BLUE BEAM 93,9921007,1930,SK,MOOSOMIN,ND,8,8,10,1,BLACK,DISC,U,DISC WITH LIGHTS MANEUVERED NR. WITNESS 94,9921025,1400,BC,NORTH VANCOUVER,DD,7,8,15,2,WHITE,,P,'HI-TECH' PLANE FLYING NR. OTHER PLANES; NO SOUND 95,9921103,1745,BC,CAMPBELL RIVER,ND,7,7,.3,2,GREY,TRIANGLE,U,'WING' WITH LIGHTS ON EDGES 96,9921126,1820,BC,OLIVER,NL,7,7,1.5,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,I,SIGHTINGS ALSO REPORTED IN USA 97,9921126,1950,SK,SASKATOON,NL,5,9,480,4,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,'YO-YO MOVEMENTS'; PROBABLE STAR 98,9921126,2000,SK,SASKATOON,NL,6,8,60,10,,,I,MANY REPORTS OF OBJ. & LIGHTS 99,9921127,2000,SK,SASKATOON,C1,8,8,.45,1,GREY,TRIANGLE,U,'BOOMERANG' OVERFLEW CAR; LIGHTS ON EDGES 100,9921200,2000,BC,108 MILE HOUSE,ND,8,8,1,4,BLUE,CYLINDER,I,LARGE CYLINDERS MOVING AT TREETOP LEVEL 101,9921200,200,BC,HORSESHOE BAY,C1,8,9,20,1,YELLOW,,I,INTENSE LIGHT OVER CAR, FOLLOWED WITNESS 102,9921218,400,BC,LAC LA HACHE,C3,9,7,30,1,,,I,3 ENTITIES SEEN BY CHILD; VERY UPSET 103,9920831,2215,NB,ALMA,NL,3,9,.06,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE 104,9920901,2220,NB,SACKVILLE,NL,3,9,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE 105,9920913,2114,ON,LONDON,NL,3,9,.04,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE 106,9920915,0,NB,SACKVILLE,NL,3,9,.02,1,,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE 107,9921013,18,ON,LONDON,NL,3,9,.01,2,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE, FRAGMENTED 108,9921121,0,ON,OTTAWA,NL,3,5,.01,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,PROBABLE BOLIDE 109,9921203,2000,AB,FORT MCMURRAY,NL,3,9,.1,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,E,BOLIDE 110,9921209,2245,PQ,TADOUSSAC,NL,6,9,.02,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,'LOUD BANG' 111,9921216,645,SK,SASKATOON,NL,3,9,1,5,,POINT SOURCE,I,PROBABLE BOLIDE 112,9920325,2000,MB,CROSS LAKE,NL,7,7,30,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,VIDEO OF 'STARS';APPARITION OF VIRGIN MARY 113,9920813,100,ON,WINONA,NL,6,7,20,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,I,2 LIGHTS MOVING NEAR CN TOWER 114,9920813,0,ON,HAMILTON,NL,5,5,15,1,WHITE,,I, 116,9920814,100,ON,HAMILTON,NL,6,7,2,1,ORANGE,,I,7 LIGHTS IN TRIANGULAR FORMATION 117,9920505,2100,ON,BELMONT,DD,8,7,1,4,WHITE,DISC,P,5 PHOTOS IN SEQUENCE; BLIMP? 118,9920112,1900,ON,SARNIA,ND,6,6,30,1,,,I,HOVERED,MOVED TOWARDS WITNESS 119,9920125,200,ON,GRAVENHURST,NL,5,4,5,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,OBJ. OVER TREES; WITNESS 5 YRS. OLD 120,9920125,0,ON,PENETANGUSHING,NL,4,7,1,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,DISTANT LIGHT, HIGH SPEED 121,9920320,2200,ON,HAMILTON,ND,7,7,2,2,RED,DISC,I,DISC FOLLOWED CAR 122,9920505,2230,ON,LONDON,NL,4,7,5,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,BRIGHT LIGHT MOVING NEAR HORIZON 123,9920531,2345,ON,TORONTO,ND,6,7,5,1,WHITE,TRIANGLE,I,WEDGE-SHAPED OBJ. WITH COLOURED LIGHTS 124,9920524,2000,ON,MISSISSAUGA,NL,3,6,3,6,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,SLOW-MOVING; 1KM DISTANT? 125,9920530,2300,ON,SCARBOROUGH,NL,5,7,5,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,3 PAIRS OF LIGHTS MOVING OVER LAKE 126,9920520,1600,ON,UXBRIDGE,DD,8,7,30,2,,TRIANGLE,I,HOVERING OBJECT; 4000FT ALT.? 127,9920602,1600,ON,SCARBOROUGH,DD,7,7,3,2,SILVER,IRREGULAR,I,'BUMPY' OBJ. VARYING SPEED 128,9920721,30,ON,TORONTO,NL,7,7,3,4,,,I,'LASER BEAM' ON GROUND; NOISE LIKE TRUCK BRAKES 129,9920813,50,ON,GLANBROOK,ND,6,7,4,2,,ROUND,I,VIDEO OF HOVERING BRIGHT OBJECT 130,9921024,2000,ON,POINT PELEE,NL,4,6,60,5,,POINT SOURCE,I,UNUSUAL DISTANT LIGHTS 131,9921103,2000,ON,TORONTO,ND,6,6,.3,1,,TRIANGLE,I, 132,9921203,200,ON,TORONTO,NL,3,7,1,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,MULTIPLE HOVERING LIGHTS 133,9920315,2215,ON,MISSISSAUGA,C1,8,6,4,2,GREEN,DISC,U,100 YDS AWAY; METALLIC WITH LIGHTS 134,9920304,2130,ON,TORONTO,ND,8,8,45,8,GREEN,IRREGULAR,U,'FLUORESCENT LIGHT' STATIONARY ABOVE CLOUDS 135,9920102,1630,NF,WESLEYVILLE,DD,6,6,6,1,BLACK,ROUND,I,NRC N92/1 136,9920109,1720,PQ,AYLMER,DD,8,5,1,1,WHITE,DISC,U,NRC N92/2; DRAWING; 8 YR. OLD GIRL; NOISE HEARD 137,9920117,1800,BC,TOFINO,ND,4,7,.1,2,YELLOW,TRIANGLE,E,NRC N92/3; BOLIDE 138,9920122,1940,NB,WOODSTOCK,ND,8,8,80,2,BLUE,TRIANGLE,U,NRC N92/4; 10 MIN. VIDEO 139,9920117,2050,MB,BIRDS HILL PARK,NL,6,6,10,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/5; 3 TRIOS OF LIGHTS NR. HORIZON 140,9920214,655,PQ,VICTORIAVILLE,NL,4,5,10,2,RED,ROUND,I,NRC N92/6; ROUGE GLOBES, EN LIGNE 141,9920224,2005,NB,LAKEVILLE,NL,3,5,.1,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/7; LIGHTS FLASHING ACROSS A FIELD 142,9920303,20,BC,FORT NELSON,ND,7,6,2,3,GREEN,CIGAR,U,NRC N92/8; HOVERING OBJ. WITH LIGHTS; ZIG-ZAGGED 143,9920304,1935,MB,THOMPSON,NL,3,7,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/9; PILOT OBSERVED FIREBALL 144,9920306,2145,NS,DALHOUSIE,NL,7,6,4,1,ORANGE,,I,NRC N92/11; GLOWING,STOPPED THEN 'BURST AWAY' 145,9920310,217,,,NL,6,7,2,3,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/12; PILOT&CREW WITNESSES 146,9920311,1549,BC,,DD,7,5,1,3,,,I,NRC N92/13; SPINNING OBJECT WITH LIGHTS 147,9920314,0,,BUTTONVILLE,NL,3,6,.02,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/14; PROB. BOLIDE 148,9920306,2240,MB,THOMPSON,C2,9,6,15,3,BLUE,,P,NRC N92/10/17; HAIRY CREATURE W/RED EYES 150,9920402,118,MB,MCCREARY,C1,8,6,.05,2,RED,,U,NRC N92/20;ROUND RED 'BULBS' DISAPPEARED 151,9920402,2358,ON,THORNHILL,NL,4,6,2,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/21; LIGHTS ZIG-ZAGGED 152,9920408,2200,NF,ST.JOHNS,NL,3,6,.15,1,,,P,NRC N92/22; FIREBALL W/SMOKE TRAIL 153,9920411,346,MB,DAUPHIN,NL,6,6,5,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/23; 'LATER' LIGHT ON ROAD AHEAD 154,9920414,800,ON,OTTAWA,NL,3,6,.03,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/24; PROB. BOLIDE 155,9920419,2000,NF,COBB,ND,6,6,2,2,ORANGE,ROUND,I,NRC N92/25; 156,9920426,10,NT,FORT SMITH,NL,3,6,.05,1,BLUE,,P,NRC N92/26; PROBABLE BOLIDE; 'STREAK' 157,9920427,1200,ON,MERRICKVILLE,DD,7,6,.02,1,RED,CIGAR,I,NRC N92/27; TORPEDO-SHAPED, FLASHING FIRE ON SIDES 158,9920427,0,,,NL,3,6,.05,1,GREEN,,P,NRC N92/28; BLUE TRAIL 159,9920429,2210,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,4,6,.15,2,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/29; GROUPS OF LIGHTS, NO SOUND 160,9920507,2230,SK,RADISSON,NL,4,6,3,1,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/30; FLASHING LIGHT NR. HORIZON 161,9920524,900,PQ,THURSO,NL,3,6,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/31; ROND AVEC TRAINEE 162,9920500,2245,ON,OTTAWA,ND,4,5,6,1,WHITE,,I,NRC N92/32; OBLONG LIGHTS 163,9920601,2150,ON,,C1,7,6,6,2,RED,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/33; 'POWER INTERRUPTION' AS LIGHT WAS SEEN 164,9920601,100,ON,,ND,5,5,5,1,WHITE,,I,NRC N92/34; 20X SIZE OF SUN, NR. HORIZON 165,9920611,2330,ON,CORNWALL,NL,3,6,.1,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/35; FALLING LIGHT 166,9920615,148,BC,SURREY,ND,4,7,.04,2,ORANGE,ROUND,P,NRC N92/36; FALLING BALL, BROKE IN PIECES IN AIR 167,9920615,2200,ON,BRACEBRIDGE,ND,4,7,.02,2,WHITE,ROUND,P,NRC N92/37; ORANGE&BLUE TAIL, SIZE OF MOON 168,9920622,0,PQ,STE-SABINE,DD,7,5,1,1,,DISC,I,NRC N92/38; PHOTO&SKETCH OF SAUCER 169,9920628,2155,PQ,TROIS-RIVIERES,NL,4,6,.02,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/40; PROBABLE BOLIDE 170,9920706,323,AB,TABER,C2,8,7,10,1,BLACK,DISC,U,NRC N92/41; SAUCER 20M AWAY, UGMS FOUND LATER 171,9920706,2215,ON,OTTAWA,ND,6,6,5,1,,OVAL,P,NRC N92/42; MCDONALD'S BLIMP? 172,9920715,2150,ON,,NL,4,6,10,1,RED,,I,NRC N92/43 'LARGE COMET' 173,9920715,2120,BC,NELSON,NL,3,6,.02,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/44; 3X SIZE OF EVENING STAR 174,9920717,2200,AB,FAIRVIEW,ND,8,8,30,50,SILVER,IRREGULAR,U,NRC N92/45; NOT A BALLOON, RCMP WITNESSES AS WELL 175,9920722,2200,NB,ALLARDVILLE,DD,8,7,5,4,WHITE,TRIANGLE,U,NRC N92/46; DRAWING OF UNUSUAL CRAFT 176,9920728,2140,NS,BIG BADDECK,ND,7,7,.3,2,YELLOW,IRREGULAR,U,NRC N92/47; LIGHT W/ZIG-ZAG APPENDAGE 177,9920729,2302,NB,FREDERICTON,NL,3,6,.01,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/48; PROBABLE BOLIDE 178,9920730,2324,BC,MISSION,ND,7,6,.15,1,YELLOW,DISC,I,NRC N92/49; UPPER PART W/8 LIGHTS, YELLOW ON LOWER 179,9920818,2001,BC,VANCOUVER,NL,3,6,.1,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/50; PROBABLE BOLIDE 180,9920819,2300,AB,CALGARY,NL,6,6,3,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/51; HUMMING SOUND 181,9920820,430,ON,,NL,6,6,30,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/52; PILOT WITNESS TO 15 LIGHTS IN ROWS 182,9920825,2320,ON,,ND,8,5,20,1,,DISC,I,NRC N92/53; 'UPSIDE DOWN SOUP BOWL', HOVERING 183,9920831,310,PQ,MONTREAL,NL,6,5,20,1,,,I,NRC N92/54 184,9920907,2020,SK,LA RONGE,NL,3,7,.02,1,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/55; PROBABLE BOLIDE 185,9920907,2040,SK,LA RONGE,NL,3,7,.03,1,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,E,NRC N92/55; 'REAL PRETTY ONE', BOLIDE 186,9920913,905,,,NL,3,5,.1,1,ORANGE,,P,NRC N92/57; SMOKE TRAIL; BOLIDE 187,9920930,2300,PQ,HEMMINGFORD,DD,7,7,15,2,SILVER,TRIANGLE,U,NRC N92/58; 'OVNI A TRES GRANDE CIRCONFERENCE' 188,9921007,1905,ON,OTTAWA,NL,7,6,.4,1,,,I,NRC N92/59; 4 LIGHTS IN SQUARE, MOVING 189,9921009,1855,ON,,NL,4,7,.3,2,WHITE,,P,NRC N92/60; SEEN FRM PLANE OVER LAKE ERIE 190,9921009,1930,ON,TORONTO,NL,4,6,.2,2,,,P,NRC N92/61; LINEAR LIGHT SEEN FRM APT. 191,9921013,2100,AB,HYTHE,NL,6,6,120,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,U,NRC N92/62; STROBE LIGHT IN DENSE FOREST 192,9921028,2030,NS,,NL,6,6,1,1,,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/63; MANY LIGHTS SEEN 193,9921105,2224,,,NL,3,5,.4,1,,,P,NRC N92/64; LEFT SMOKE TRAIL 194,9921108,1830,MB,LUNDAR,C2,8,7,.1,1,WHITE,,U,NRC N92/65; CAR STOPPED WHEN 'SPARKLERS' APPEARED 195,9921111,1800,PQ,POINTE-AU-TREMBLES,ND,7,6,30,1,RED,,I,NRC N92/66; 3 LIGHTS BRIGHTER THEN DIMMER 196,9921119,130,,,NL,5,5,5,2,RED,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/67 197,9921120,632,ON,OTTAWA,NL,3,6,.03,1,GREEN,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/68; PROBABLE BOLIDE 198,9921120,640,ON,NORTH BAY,NL,3,6,.02,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/70 199,9921121,2320,ON,OTTAWA,NL,6,6,15,2,YELLOW,POINT SOURCE,I,NRC N92/71; FORMATIONS OF LIGHTS, HIGH ALTITUDE 200,9921127,2250,AB,FORT MCMURRAY,NL,5,6,1.5,2,RED,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/72; FLARE? 201,9921128,1930,AB,IRMA,NL,4,7,1,2,,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/73; PROBABLE BOLIDE 202,9921205,2150,ON,,NL,4,5,10,1,BLUE,,I,NRC N92/74 203,9921208,743,ON,VERNON,NL,4,6,.2,1,BLUE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/75; PROB. BOLIDE 204,9921208,745,ON,OTTAWA,NL,3,6,.03,1,,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/76 205,9921208,750,ON,,NL,4,5,.15,0,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,NRC N92/77 206,9921209,1745,ON,,NL,5,5,25,2,ORANGE,ROUND,I,NRC N92/78; STATIONARY ROUND OBJ. 207,9921213,545,ON,,NL,3,7,.1,1,RED,,P,NRC N92/79 208,9921213,755,ON,,NL,5,5,20,1,BLACK,ROUND,I,NRC N92/80; ROUND OBJ. WITH SMOKE TRAIL 209,9921225,1920,ON,,ND,7,7,2,3,WHITE,CIGAR,U,NRC N92/81; UNKNOWN OBJ. SEEN FROM AIRCRAFT 210,9921225,1930,PQ,SALLUIT,NL,5,5,1,1,,,I,NRC N92/82 212,9920331,2230,MB,PINE RIVER,C2,7,7,.05,3,WHITE,,U,'DUST KICKED UP'; FLASH SEEN 213,9920300,2300,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,6,7,.1,2,WHITE,,P,6 LIGHTS IN ECHELON FORMATION 214,9920509,1800,MB,WINNIPEG,DD,6,7,.05,1,SILVER,CIGAR,P,'LIKE PLANE GOING DOWN' 215,9920600,2000,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,6,6,.15,1,WHITE,,P,6 LIGHTS IN DIAMOND FORMATION 216,9920717,2300,MB,TYNDALL,NL,6,7,.05,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,P,FOUR BLUE LIGHTS FOLLOWING A WHITE ONE 217,9920720,2358,MB,WINNIPEG,ND,7,8,.11,2,RED,DISC,U,PILOT SAW FORMATION OF 6 DISCS 218,9920721,2000,MB,WINNIPEG,ND,7,6,15,3,WHITE,OVAL,U,'ALUMINUM' OBJ. MOVED SLOWLY IN ARC 219,9920721,2330,MB,WINNIPEG,ND,7,8,.2,2,WHITE,TRIANGLE,U,PILOT SAW 4 'DELTAS' IN V-FORMATION 220,9920722,2000,MB,WINNIPEG,DD,7,6,8,1,WHITE,DISC,U,'LIKE PIECE OF THE MOON' 221,9920800,2000,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,6,3,1,1,RED,,I,LUMINOUS OBJECT 222,9920819,2255,MB,WINNIPEG,ND,5,7,1,1,WHITE,,P,VIDEO OF SLOW-MOVING LIGHT NR. AIRPORT 223,9920912,2300,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,6,7,.1,1,WHITE,POINT SOURCE,U,13 DISCS IN FORMATION SEEN BY PILOT 224,9921017,1800,MB,ASHERN,DD,8,7,1,1,BLACK,TRIANGLE,U,'MANTA RAY' FLYING SLOWLY NEAR HOUSE 225,9921101,200,MB,WINNIPEG,C4,9,8,30,1,,,U,ABDUCTION REPORTED BY NURSE 226,9921103,1700,MB,WINNIPEG,NL,3,5,.2,1,ORANGE,POINT SOURCE,P,'FLARE MOVING DOWN' -- Chris Rutkowski - rutkows@ccu.umanitoba.ca University of Manitoba - Winnipeg, Canada